One more thing!

One more thing that i don't understand is those people who harbour some sort of resentment towards a given article that makes minced dick out of one of their favourite pass-times/porn stars, yet can't accumulate enough (figurative) balls to give the writer a straight 'fuck you'.

Of course, the guy who does give a straight 'fuck you' is also an idiot, but at the very least has more figurative testicles than the guy who hides behind a pretense of politeness that is obviously there to try to 'be the bigger man' and 'be objective'.

First of all, 'being the bigger man' means jack shit on the internet, cause the person you're conversing with may very well have a vagina and you wouldn't even know. My disregard of figures of speech aside, trying to 'be the bigger man' ends up sounding incredibly condescending most of the time and comes off as trying way too hard not to show that you actually want to grind his face into the pavement. There is only one given exception to this, and that exception is when the article you're so pissed off at was written by a fucking idiot.

Secondly, but definitely not least(ly), you can't 'be objective' because the fact that the article pissed you off means that you disagree with him, jackass. I read something online that dissed the shit out a particular game for humours sake, talking about how everybody who played it was a complete idiot and had no life, and WoW was it funny; one of the comments could be summarized by "That was hilarious lol but I have a life I play sports and have a family. Your last two points were good ones, though."

For one, you're trying to prove to someone that you have a life over the internet, which by all reasonable understanding is completely contradictory. For two, it's the fucking internet, who do you have to prove yourself to? Not like they know you or anything, screw them. The very fact that you're defending yourself against that means three things:
1. You're an idiot.
2. Your self-esteem must be somewhere in the 13th circle of hell.
3. You're an idiot.

Furthermore, if you went through all the trouble of trying to disprove the article, saying that he makes a couple of good points would be counterproductive, you think? Imagine for a moment that someone tells you that your babymaker is shorter than 6 inches (girls must do this too), then you say, "Well I have an average sized lovestick, you know, cause the worldwide average is around 5.5, not 6. But I guess you're a little bit right."

That's like saying "No I'm not an idiot, but I guess I am a little bit of one."

Doesn't work, friend. Your vagplug is still shorter than 6 inches, and the other guy's still right, with the added bonus of knowing that you're an utter dumbass.

Edit: Feel free to go rancorous over this post and prove me right again kthx.